9/2/2023 0 Comments Arcolinux![]() For the past year and a half my focus has primarily been on using, learning, and getting comfortable with Linux. I have been using Linux off and on for many years. Thought it might help someone who might be confused about whether to install Manjaro, EndeavourOS or ArcoLinux. Anybody, of any experience, can give up a quarter of an hour and have it installed with a few clicks.Īdding my experience to this feed even though it it getting a bit old. So, whether one has 20 years of Linux behind them, or 20 days, why not just get Arch? Because there are simpler ways to achieve the same goal. Compare that to this: Ĭould I install Arch in the same time as the two other distributions I mentioned? Quite likely not, as I think I've only gone through the process twice so it's all far from muscle-memory, and would require reading and following instructions. Click a few times for internet connection, partitions, locale, select desktop environment, install bootloader. My reply was to this, very limited in reasoning, and ultimately correct - both EndeavourOS and Manjaro can be installed quickly, with minimal fuss. Hang on - where did I give any advice on Arch? I was responding to the question of "Why not just get Arch?". For some people Arch can take days to install as you learn the system and other's as little as 15 minutes after many installs and learning. To even use at it as some sort of baseline for giving advice on Arch. ![]() Otherwise, explore more stable (as in package releases) such as Feodra, OpenSuse, Ubuntum, Debian etc. In actuality this your best opportunities to learn things. ![]() If you're looking to have a system close to upstream, rolling release, and like the AUR/pacman then sure you will be fine with any of the arch based distros but may run into problems later on when something breaks, and you need to do manual interventions. (some could even argue that we shouldn't stop till we hit Gentoo or LFS) Anything else is just abstracting the user away from the system which is what the arch developers intended not to happen. Really, the advice we should be perpetuating to /u/_a_taki_se_polaczek_ is what our your goals with your system? Are you trying to learn and understand how your system works? Because vanilla arch is the best away to go about it. It's disingenuous for /u/monerocamel to even use at it as some sort of baseline for giving advice on Arch. I've played soccer my entire life, and it doesn't make me good at it or worse, specifically qualified to give any sort of advice over the subject. Unfortunately, years in experience doesn't necessarily equate to any level of mastery in Linux nor really in anything in life. If I had to choose between the two distributions, I would therefore choose EndeavourOS. In the official announcement area made the statement that the user is to blame if there are problems with an update). Lost many (all?) images in the forum due to a faulty backup. The last time recommended as a solution that the users should reset the date of their computers so that the certificate is "valid" again. In my opinion, the team responsible for Manjaro has made too many mistakes in the past (twice forgetting to renew the SSL certificate. A few weeks ago, for example, there was someone here who wanted to install the Nvidia drivers under Manjaro via the package nvidia-dkms. Also, some packages that are available under Arch are not available. So certain updates are delayed, which is to serve the stability. Manjaro on the other hand goes its own way in some aspects. So you could call it Arch Linux with a graphical installer. EndeavourOS tries to stay pretty close to Arch Linux but offer a relatively easy way to install it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |